Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing case study and need an explanation and a

by | Dec 20, 2021 | Nursing | 0 comments

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Learning Goal: I’m working on a nursing case study and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).
The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.
Mixed-methods studies should not be used.
Dissertations should not be used.
Your critique should include the following:Research Problem/PurposeState the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.
Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?
Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?
State the purpose of the research.
Review of the LiteratureIdentify the concepts explored in the literature review.
Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?
Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)?
Theoretical FrameworkAre the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?
Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?
Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?
If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.
Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?
Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?
Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?
Conceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)Are key concepts defined conceptually?
Is the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?
Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?
MethodologyWhat type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?
Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?
State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.
Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?
State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)
Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)Were the methods of gathering data appropriate?
Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?
Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?
Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?
Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?
Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?Data AnalysisWhat data analysis tool was used?
Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)
How were the results presented in the study?
Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)
Identify at least one (1) finding.
Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and RecommendationsDo the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?
Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?
Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?
Are there clear explanation of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit trail?
What are the strengths and limitations of the study?
In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.
Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).
The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines.NURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research CritiqueNURS_350_OL – NURS350-Research CritiqueCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Problem/Purpose28 to >24.92 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are clearly identified.24.92 to >21.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are somewhat identified.21 to >16.52 ptsBelow ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are mostly absent or misidentified.16.52 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsResearch problem, purpose of research, and relevance to nursing are absent.28 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReview of the Literature42 to >37.38 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are clearly identified. Critique of the references is included and well developed.37.38 to >31.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are somewhat identified. Critique of the references is included, but may not be fully developed.31.5 to >24.78 ptsBelow ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are misidentified. Critique of the references is severely lacking.24.78 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsConcepts explored in the literature review are absent. Critique of the references is absent.42 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Framework28 to >24.92 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is identified and well analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a suitable one is suggested.24.92 to >21.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, but it is somewhat inappropriate.21 to >16.52 ptsBelow ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is somewhat identified and analyzed for appropriateness. If the article lacks a concept/framework, a potential concept/framework is suggested, is not identified or is grossly inappropriate.16.52 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsA theoretical concept/framework is misidentified or not analyzed for appropriateness.28 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVariables, Hypotheses, Questions, and Assumptions14 to >12.46 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsIV and DV are identified and defined. Discussion on measurability is included. Research question and hypothesis are identified.12.46 to >10.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsIV and DV are somewhat identified and or partially defined. Discussion on measurability is somewhat included. Research question and hypothesis are partially identified.10.5 to >8.26 ptsBelow ExpectationsIV and DV identification and definition are absent or severely lacking. Discussion on measurability is absent or inaccurate. Research question and hypothesis are not identified or grossly misidentified.8.26 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsIV and DV identification and definition are absent. Discussion on measurability is absent. Research question and hypothesis are not identified.14 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethodology56 to >49.84 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are properly identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed.49.84 to >42.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are somewhat identified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are discussed, but some information is inaccurate.42 to >33.04 ptsBelow ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent or misidentified. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are either absent or grossly inaccurate.33.04 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsType of design, sample size, study population, sampling method, and type of reasoning are absent. Reliability and validity of measurement tools, ethical considerations, and probability vs. non-probability sampling are absent.56 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis42 to >37.38 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsData analysis tool is identified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included and accurate. At least one finding is appropriately identified.37.38 to >31.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsData analysis tool is somewhat identified. An incomplete explanation on how the results are presented in the study is included. At least one finding is identified.31.5 to >24.78 ptsBelow ExpectationsData analysis tool is absent or misidentified. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent or grossly unclear. Findings are not included or are grossly inaccurate.24.78 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsData analysis tool is absent. An explanation on how the results are presented in the study is absent. Findings are not included.42 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary, Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations56 to >49.84 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of the study are identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is included and appropriate.49.84 to >42.0 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of the study are somewhat identified. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is included but may not be fully developed. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing may not be fully developed.42 to >33.04 ptsBelow ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of study are absent or lacking. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent or lacking. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent or inappropriate.33.04 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsStrengths and limitations of study are absent. A discussion on whether or not the study can be generalized is absent. An evaluation of the findings, conclusions, and significance to nursing is absent.56 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA Format14 to >12.46 ptsMeets or Exceeds ExpectationsWritten in a clear, concise, formal, and organized manner. Responses are mostly error free. Information from sources is appropriately paraphrased and accurately cited.12.46 to >10.5 ptsMostly Meets ExpectationsWriting is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language. Multiple errors exist in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension. Most information from sources is correctly paraphrased and cited.10.5 to >8.26 ptsBelow ExpectationsWriting is generally unclear and unorganized. Some errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing or improperly cited.8.26 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsWriting is unclear and unorganized. Errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension. Sources are missing.14 ptsTotal Points: 280
Requirements: 6   |   .doc file

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Fast Delivery

We know your paper is URGENT! Whatever your deadline is, we’ll always submit your paper on time. Always!

24-7 Support

Have a request at 2am? Our support team is available to you on a 24/7 basis through email, messaging or live chat.

Unlimited Revision

Do you need any edits done to your paper? All our assignments come with a free unlimited revisions tag!

Total Privacy

We take your privacy very seriously. You can rest assured that your identity will forever remain private.

100% Original

All our papers are written from scratch. Which guarantees that every paper you receive has 0% plagiarism.

Affordable Prices

We plagiarism-free high-quality papers from as low as $12. Additionally, we offer lifetime personal discounts.

How It Works

b

Tell us about your homework assignment.

~

Securely pay for your academic paper

j

Paper gets assigned to an expert tutor

Receive the complete paper via email

“Thanks guys! You have great writer who helped me in my last assignment! I got excellent grade in my last assignment and i will recommend you!”

Benjamin

“Being associated with experts minds for 1 year, i am extremely happy and fully satisfied with your high class assistance and quality writing services! Cheers!”

Jane 

I had casually placed an order on Lesson-edu.info for a short essay and wanted to see if their claim of timely delivery of tasks was true or not. The assignment was not delivered on time, but the quality of the essay was also remarkable.

Alice

Team up With Your Own Writing Expert Now

Stuck with overwhelming assignments? We will take care of all your writing tasks.

%d bloggers like this: