Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

I need a response to the answer below. Bascially an opinion an the following statement.

by | Jun 6, 2022 | Law | 0 comments

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

I need a response to the answer below. Bascially an opinion an the following statement.
The theory of statutory interpretation that I find most compelling is that of Supreme Court Justice Antony Scalia’s, whatever you may call it. Various sources across academia list it differently so I feel the need to explain. In 2016, very shortly after his death, National Public Radio described his statutory interpretation as originalism.[1] In our textbook, originalism is described as being the statutory interpretations of Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barret while Scalia was only casual about it.[2] In our textbook, textualism seems to be described as Justice Scalia’s theory of statutory interpretation.[3] To simplify, I will refer to Scalia’s view as originalism, which may be a combination of the textbook’s definitions of both textualism and originalism.
There are many reasons I find originalism most appealing. Originalism is actually quite simple and does not require much of an education to understand. The plain meaning rule is how we already handle conversation or written rule in everyday life. When we see a stop sign that says “stop,” we need not perform values analysis because we know that it plainly means to “come to a stop.” We do not need to add anything else to the meaning of the sign. Likewise, as Scalia stated, the Constitution is “a legal document, and it says what it says and doesn’t say what it doesn’t say.”[4] Laws can be interpreted in a straightforward manner. Originalism takes the plain meaning rule just a small step further and interprets law based on the plain meaning of the specific words in law at the time in which they were written.
One supposed problem of originalism is anachronisms, or otherwise stated as the possibility that a word may have changed meaning over time.[5] However, that is no problem at all due to the abundance of easily accessible dictionaries both online and in print. Furthermore, originalism inherently negates that problem due to its emphasis on word meanings.

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

How It Works

b

Tell us about your homework assignment.

~

Securely pay for your academic paper

j

Paper gets assigned to an expert tutor

Receive the complete paper via email

Team up With Your Own Writing Expert Now

Stuck with overwhelming assignments? We will take care of all your writing tasks.